Finding the best MRI manufacturer is not easy. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is one of the most important imaging techniques in modern medicine. Whether in radiology, orthopaedics or neurology – MRI devices enable precise diagnoses that are crucial for successful treatment.
There are numerous manufacturers on the market, such as Siemens Healthineers, GE HealthCare, Philips or Canon Medical Systems, who offer MRI devices with different technologies and price models. However, not every device is suitable for every facility and choosing the right manufacturer can be challenging.
In this article, we compare the leading MRI manufacturers and their devices. Our aim is to give you a clear overview of the pros and cons of each brand so that you can make the best choice for your medical facility.
The best MRI manufacturers compared – used or new?
Choosing the right MRI machine is a key decision for any medical facility. In addition to the question of which manufacturer offers the best equipment, there is often also the question of whether a new or used MRI scanner is the better choice. Both options have their advantages and disadvantages, which depend heavily on individual needs, budget and the planned area of application.
The leading MRI manufacturers in 2025 at a glance:
- Siemens HealthineersMarket leader in Germany with innovative technologies such as BioMatrix and TurboSuite.
- GE HealthcareKnown for low maintenance costs and strong upgrade capabilities.
- Philips Healthcare: Convinces with excellent image quality and powerful magnets.
- Canon Medical Systems (formerly Toshiba): Scores with quiet scans and low acquisition costs.
- Hitachi: Specialist for open MRI devices with low operating costs.
Buy a new or used MRI scanner?
A new MRI machine offers state-of-the-art technology, longer warranty periods and the certainty that there are no hidden defects. However, the purchase costs are considerably higher. Used MRI machines can be a cost-effective alternative, especially if they come from a trusted supplier like us who offers refurbished machines with a warranty. Important factors to consider include the age, magnetic field strength and condition of the device.
In the following article, we will look at all the factors you should consider when making a decision.
1 What is an MRI scanner and what types are there?
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), also known as magnetic resonance imaging, is an imaging technique that uses magnetic fields to create precise images of organs and tissue in the body. This radiation-free procedure is particularly gentle and offers excellent image quality for numerous medical diagnoses.
1.1 Definition and function of an MRI machine
MRI machines work with strong magnetic fields that influence hydrogen protons in the body. These protons emit signals that are converted into high-resolution images. This method is indispensable for the diagnosis of diseases in the brain, spinal cord, joints and internal organs.
Some of the leading manufacturers have specialized in certain technologies:
- Siemens Healthineers: Market leader with innovative technologies such as Tim (Total Imaging Matrix) for whole-body imaging.
- Philips Healthcare: Known for their powerful magnets and high image quality, ideal for specialized diagnostics.
- Hitachi: Focused on open MRI systems for claustrophobic or overweight patients.
1.2 Closed and open MRI devices
There are two main types of MRI machines that fulfill different requirements:
Closed MRI devices
Closed systems consist of a tubular construction and offer the highest magnetic field strength (1.5T to 3.0T). They provide the best images for complex diagnoses and are often offered by manufacturers such as Siemens (e.g. Magnetom Aera) and GE Healthcare (e.g. Signa Explorer). Their disadvantage is that the narrow design can cause claustrophobia in some patients.
Open MRI devices
Open systems use disk magnets that offer more space for the patient. Manufacturers such as Hitachi (e.g. AIRIS series) have specialized in these devices, which are particularly suitable for claustrophobic or overweight patients. However, the magnetic field strength is often lower with open MRIs, which can lead to a lower image resolution.
Depending on the area of application and patient group, certain manufacturers offer clear advantages. The choice of the right MRI device should always be tailored to the individual requirements of your facility.
3. the leading MRI manufacturers at a glance
In this section, we introduce the leading MRI manufacturers and compare their strengths, models, advantages and disadvantages. Each manufacturer brings unique technologies and focuses that may have different relevance depending on the purpose and requirements of your facility.
3.1 Siemens Healthineers
Strengths: Siemens is the market leader in Germany and Europe and is known for innovative technologies such as BioMatrix (adaptive magnetic field control) and TurboSuite (faster scans).
Top models from Siemens are: Siemens Magnetom Aera, Magnetom Avanto FIT, Magnetom Skyra.
Advantages:
- High image quality for precise diagnoses.
- User-friendliness through intuitive user interfaces.
- Energy-efficient “zero-boil-off” solenoids that require little to no helium refilling for cooling.
Disadvantages:
- High acquisition costs, which can be a hurdle for smaller practices.
3.2 GE Healthcare
Strengths: GE impresses with high parts availability, low maintenance costs and upgradeable systems that can be used over the long term.
Top models: GE Signa Artist, Optima 450W, Discovery MR750.
Advantages:
- Lower running costs thanks to simple maintenance.
- Broad service infrastructure and many qualified technicians.
- Upgrade options for older devices to keep pace with technological developments.
Disadvantages:
- Higher acquisition costs compared to other manufacturers.
- Less choice for specific technologies such as silent scanning or advanced image optimization.
3.3 Philips Healthcare
Strengths: Philips offers powerful magnets and innovative features such as dStream for improved signal processing.
Top models: Philips Ingenia, Achieva with REX magnet.
Advantages:
- Favorable acquisition costs compared to Siemens and GE.
- Excellent image quality, especially for complex diagnoses.
- Modern technology for efficient use.
Disadvantages:
- Higher running costs, particularly due to the consumption of cryogen.
- Reduced availability of spare parts and service technicians.
3.4 Canon Medical Systems (formerly Toshiba)
Strengths: Canon scores with low acquisition costs and Pianissimo technology, which enables particularly quiet scans.
Top models: Canon Vantage, Canon Titan.
Advantages:
- Affordable entry for facilities with a smaller budget.
- All models are wide-bore devices that offer more space for patients.
- Solid image quality for most standard applications.
Disadvantages:
- Fewer innovations in older devices compared to market leaders.
- Limited selection of special functions.
3.5 Hitachi
Strengths: Hitachi is the specialist for open MRI machines with low magnetic field strength, ideal for claustrophobic and overweight patients.
Top models: AIRIS Vento, OASIS.
Advantages:
- Ideal for patient groups who have difficulties in closed MRIs.
- Low operating costs due to the absence of complex cooling systems.
- User-friendly and space-saving installation.
Disadvantages:
- Lower image quality due to the lower magnetic field strength.
- Limited suitability for highly complex diagnoses.
This overview provides you with a solid basis for narrowing down the manufacturers and models that are suitable for your facility. Whether high image quality, low operating costs or special patient comfort – each manufacturer offers unique advantages.
4. buy MRI new or used? A question of budget
The decision between a new or used MRI machine depends on your facility’s budget and requirements. While new devices are equipped with the latest technologies, used models offer a cost-effective alternative, especially if they are refurbished by trusted providers (we offer this refurbishment for all our products).
4.1 Advantages of used MRI devices
Used MRI devices offer an attractive opportunity to avoid the high purchase costs of new devices. They allow a more affordable entry, which is particularly advantageous for smaller practices or facilities with a limited budget. At MedProTech, almost all used devices are thoroughly overhauled before being resold. These products then come with a guarantee or warranty, which offers additional security.
Another advantage is the sustainable use of existing resources, as functional appliances have a longer service life. This not only makes economic sense, but is also environmentally friendly. In addition, the delivery of a used device can often be faster than when ordering a new device, which is particularly important for time-critical projects.
Summary of the advantages:
- Cost-effective entry with the same functionality.
- Refurbished appliances with warranty from the dealer.
- Fast availability compared to new devices.
- Sustainable and environmentally friendly use.
- Opportunity to purchase high-quality appliances at a fraction of the price of new ones.
4.2 Disadvantages of used MRI devices
Despite the cost benefits, used MRI devices can also present challenges. The remaining life of the equipment is often limited, especially with older models, which can result in a shorter useful life. Higher maintenance costs are also possible, as older components are more susceptible to wear and tear and need to be replaced more frequently.
Another disadvantage is the lack of availability of modern innovations that are reserved for newer devices. This can affect the efficiency and quality of imaging, especially for highly specialized diagnoses. Additionally, it is important to check the condition of the device carefully, as private sellers often do not offer a warranty. Facilities that have high demands on image quality and the latest technologies should therefore consider the limitations of used equipment.
Summary of the disadvantages:
- Limited remaining service life and higher susceptibility to repairs.
- Higher running costs for maintenance and spare parts.
- Lack of technical innovations and up-to-date functions.
- No guarantee for private purchases.
- Less suitable for state-of-the-art or specialized applications.
If you are also looking for a new C-arm and are wondering whether you should buy a used or new C-arm, please read our specialist article on this topic.
5 Decision-making factors when choosing the right MRI manufacturer
Choosing the right MRI manufacturer depends on several key factors, which can be weighted differently for each individual medical facility. Below we look at the most important aspects that should be considered when making a decision.
5.1 Budget: comparison of acquisition costs and running costs
The available budget is often the most important factor when choosing an MRI scanner. New appliances require high purchase costs, but offer the latest technologies and longer warranty periods.
Used appliances are a cheaper alternative, but can incur higher running costs for maintenance and repairs.
Manufacturers such as GE score with low maintenance costs, while Philips appliances are cheaper to buy but more expensive to run.
A comparison of one-off and ongoing costs is crucial in order to avoid long-term financial burdens.
5.2 Image quality: requirements depending on the medical field of application
Image quality is essential for precise diagnostics.
Facilities that perform highly specialized diagnoses, such as neurology or oncology, benefit from devices with high magnetic field strength and innovative technologies such as Siemens BioMatrix or Philips dStream.
Devices with a lower field strength are often sufficient for standard examinations or general radiology.
It is important to compare the requirements of the respective medical field of application with the technical specifications of the device.
5.3 Service and spare parts: Availability and reliability
Reliable service and the availability of spare parts are crucial for the smooth operation of an MRI scanner.
Manufacturers such as GE and Siemens offer a broad infrastructure for spare parts and qualified technicians, which minimizes downtimes.
Devices from manufacturers with a limited service network or a restricted range of parts, on the other hand, can entail higher risks and costs.
It is advisable to check the manufacturer’s service conditions carefully before purchasing.
5.4 Patient comfort: importance of wide-bore or open MRIs
Patient comfort is an important factor, especially when treating claustrophobic or overweight patients.
Manufacturers such as Hitachi have specialized in open MRI scanners that offer more space, while Canon offers a solution between closed and open devices with wide-bore models.
Facilities with a wide range of patients should take this aspect into account when making their decision.
5.5 Energy efficiency: relevance for long-term operating costs
The energy efficiency of an MRI scanner plays an important role in long-term operating costs.
Devices with “zero-boil-off” technology, such as those offered by Siemens or GE , significantly reduce the consumption of liquid helium and thus lower running costs.
Energy-efficient systems not only save costs, but also contribute to a more sustainable use of resources.
6 Conclusion: Which manufacturer suits your interior?
Choosing the right MRI manufacturer is a strategic decision that depends on your budget, the requirements of your medical field and the needs of your patients. Each manufacturer brings unique strengths that are tailored to specific requirements.
Summary of strengths and weaknesses:
- Siemens Healthineers offers the highest image quality and innovative technologies such as BioMatrix, but at a higher acquisition cost.
- GE HealthCare scores with low maintenance costs and upgradeable devices, but has less choice when it comes to specialized technologies.
- Philips Healthcare impresses with low acquisition costs and powerful magnets, but with higher running costs.
- Canon Medical Systems is a good choice for facilities with smaller budgets, offering quiet scanning but less innovation on older machines.
- Hitachi is the specialist for open MRIs and offers comfort for special patient groups, but with a lower image quality.
Recommendation:
If your budget is high and you value top quality, Siemens is an excellent choice. For facilities with a medium budget and a focus on low operating costs, GE or Canon are attractive options. If you are treating patients with special needs such as claustrophobia, Hitachi with open MRIs could be the ideal solution. Philips is particularly suitable for practices that are looking for strong image quality at a lower initial cost and are prepared to accept running costs.
By comparing the strengths and weaknesses of the manufacturers with the requirements of your facility, you will find the right MRI scanner to increase the efficiency of your diagnostics and at the same time increase patient satisfaction. MedProTech supports you in this decision, regardless of whether you need a new or a used device.
0 Comments